on why Goldman Sachs is not getting a share of the fees from the biggest deal of the year (so far)

Link: http://fortune.com/2016/10/25/goldman-sachs-years-biggest-deal-time-warner-att/

——————–

Goldman rarely is absent from a large transaction, but it’s not in the AT&T
– Time Warner deal. A Reuter’s story that is running in several places
(pick your favorite) explains why.

at Fortune magazine:
http://fortune.com/2016/10/25/goldman-sachs-years-biggest-deal-time-warner-att/

CNBC:
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/25/reuters-america-goldman-closer-to-murdoch-than-bugs-bunny-misses-years-biggest-deal.html

in the UK — The Daily Mail:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/reuters/article-3869526/Goldman-closer-Murdoch-Bugs-Bunny-misses-years-biggest-deal.html

Business Insider:
http://www.businessinsider.com/r-goldman-closer-to-murdoch-than-bugs-bunny-misses-years-biggest-deal-2016-10

Yahoo Finance:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/goldman-closer-murdoch-bugs-bunny-050001408.html


_____________________
Erik Gordon
Ross School of Business
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan

Leave a comment